TEHRAN, Young Journalists Club (YJC) - Police fired rubber bullets and beanbag rounds at the crowds, weapons that have not been widely used in recent history.
Human rights groups criticized the tough tactics, while police said they were necessary against crowds of people who broke through barriers outside government headquarters and the legislature on Wednesday.
The violence left 79 people injured, Hong Kong's Hospital Authority said. Police said 22 officers were among the injured.
"Because there were serious clashes outside the Legislative Council, we had to use some weapons including police batons, pepper spray, pepper based solution, bean bag rounds, rubber bullets, and tear gas," said Stephen Lo, the Hong Kong commissioner of police.
Many protesters wore hard hats, masks and plastic wrap as protection. Eleven were arrested.
Tear gas was used for the first time since the huge pro-democracy "Umbrella Movement" demonstrations in 2014, which marked the beginning of a shift to a tougher police approach.
Steve Tsang, director of the China Institute at London's School of Oriental and African Studies, said that before 2014, Hong Kong police handled large demonstrations by using softer, non-confrontational tactics. They didn't wear tactical helmets and instead gave out bottled water and medical kits.
The officers "almost invariably managed to get the local demonstrators to cooperate with them," he said. Police "kept all the hardware in vans and buses" instead of bringing it out onto the streets, he added.
In September 2014, police unleashed 87 rounds of tear gas at protesters who had amassed in the same location as the current protests. They temporarily forced the protesters off the roads they had occupied, but after the smoke dissipated, bigger crowds returned, angrier than before, and didn't leave for nearly three months.
Tsang said a similar result is the most likely outcome this time.
Amnesty International's Hong Kong director, Man-Kei Tam, said tear gas and rubber bullets should never be used to disperse peaceful protesters because they are "notoriously inaccurate and indiscriminate, and can result in serious injury and even death."
Source: AP