- Nineteen prisoners use cutlery to break out of cells at Winchester prison
- France wants progress in Ukraine before Russia returns to G7
- Italy president begins talks to seek way out of government crisis
- Italian PM expected to resign as political chaos deepens
- Russia says US cruise missile test ‘regrettable’
- Kremlin - No date set for Normandy talks on Ukraine despite Macron meeting
- Egypt court hands out 6 death sentences on terror charges
- Putin says Russian nuclear explosion poses no threat
- Russian panel eyes alleged foreign interference in protests
- Gran Canaria wildfire triggers evacuation of thousands of people
- PM Johnson calls on Germany and France to compromise on Brexit
- Sudan's ex-president Bashir arrives at corruption trial
TEHRAN, May 08 - Four years after the United States hailed reduced threats to the greater sage grouse in the West as the largest land conservation effort in U.S. history, government and conservation groups are in a tug of war.
TEHRAN, Young Journalists Club (YJC) - On one side is the Trump administration, with Interior Secretary David Bernhardt approving new land-management plans. On the other are conservation groups suing to stop the plans over concerns they will weaken sage grouse protections and open the lands to uses such as oil and gas drilling that could destroy sage grouse habitat in seven states: Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Nevada, California and Oregon.
"The Trump plans pretty much eliminate any of the required protections and even some of the goal statements and objectives that were in the Obama plans to help move sage grouse habitat toward a healthy state and support a sage grouse recovery," said Erik Molvar, executive director of the Western Watersheds Project, which with the Center for Biological Diversity, WildEarth Guardians and Prairie Hills Audubon Society filed a motion April 19 seeking an injunction of the new plans.
In 2015, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service withdrew the sage grouse from consideration for protection under the Endangered Species Act, crediting an "unprecedented, landscape-scale conservation effort" with its decision that the bird does not face extinction despite long-term population declines.
The large, ground-dwelling birds are distinctive for their mating rituals, in which the males strut their plumage and inflate bright yellow air sacks on their breasts.
The controversy involves about 90 individual land-use plans in states across the West that address such uses as mining, drilling and agriculture, along with protections for sage grouse and sagebrush ecosystems. The latest court filing is a continuation of legal challenges started over land-management plans adopted under the Obama administration in 2015.
Amendments to those plans have drawn mixed reactions, with some saying they weaken or eliminate sage grouse protections and others saying they clarify and bring federal plans more closely in line with state plans.
Sage grouse plans and the changes to them vary by state. Among the most concerning to Molvar were the elimination of prioritization of development outside of priority habitats and the elimination of a 7-inch grass height objective for livestock grazing.
Bob Budd, chairman of the Wyoming Sage Grouse Implementation Team, called the recent amendments "pretty straightforward." The team was formed in 2007 by then-Gov. Dave Freudenthal and developed the state's Sage Grouse Executive Order, which became the model for the federal land-use plans in Wyoming.
"We had seven areas that we needed to get clarified and corrected and we did that," Budd said of the new land-management plans, noting that the changes included such things as eliminating noise restrictions and placing mitigation assessment under state authority. "It didn't change our executive order. It did not change how we manage for the bird. It didn't change anything other than clarifying those areas where there was a lack of clarity."
Wyoming was the first state to implement a sage grouse plan and has the largest population of the birds, estimated to include about 35 percent to 40 percent of all sage grouse. Efforts to develop those plans are credited with keeping the sage grouse from being listed under the Endangered Species Act.
Sage grouse habitat and populations are a patchwork across the West, with some areas declining and others remaining steady, said David Dahlgren, assistant professor in Utah State University's Wildland Resources Department. He said a complex variety of factors affect the birds.
"The truth is no one thing is going to save the sage grouse," he said. "So, given that, I think we have to talk in scale. What matters to sage grouse is they're a landscape species, meaning that they need large intact landscapes of sagebrush habitat if they're going to persist."
Along with concerns about the impact of industry and agriculture on ecosystems, sage grouse face such threats as wildfire, climate change and West Nile virus.
"I'm concerned overall," Dahlgren said. "I don't think there's a sage grouse biologist or anyone who works closely with sage grouse who isn't concerned. There's just so much risk, even with our intact populations. ... But, having said that I'm concerned, I think that we need to remember that we have stable populations, we have large intact landscapes still left, and that's the reason for our priority areas. We need to use our resources to make sure those stay in place while then after that looking at our more at-risk situations."
Source: upi
Your Comment