- Nineteen prisoners use cutlery to break out of cells at Winchester prison
- France wants progress in Ukraine before Russia returns to G7
- Italy president begins talks to seek way out of government crisis
- Italian PM expected to resign as political chaos deepens
- Russia says US cruise missile test ‘regrettable’
- Kremlin - No date set for Normandy talks on Ukraine despite Macron meeting
- Egypt court hands out 6 death sentences on terror charges
- Putin says Russian nuclear explosion poses no threat
- Russian panel eyes alleged foreign interference in protests
- Gran Canaria wildfire triggers evacuation of thousands of people
- PM Johnson calls on Germany and France to compromise on Brexit
- Sudan's ex-president Bashir arrives at corruption trial
TEHRAN, Mar31-An investigation into the leaking of Amazon CEO and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos’ private phone data has revealed that Saudi Arabia hacked his phone, possibly because of the Post’s coverage of the state-sponsored murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.
TEHRAN, Young Journalists Club (YJC) -The finding was announced by Gavin de Becker, a security consultant and long-time associate of Bezos’ who was recently commissioned by him to find out how his text messages and photos had been obtained by American Media Inc (AMI), the publisher of the National Enquirer tabloid.
“Our investigators and several experts concluded with high confidence that the Saudis had access to Bezos’ phone, and gained private information,” de Becker wrote in an article for The Daily Beast website on Saturday.
On its front page in January, the National Enquirer said Bezos had been “caught cheating on his wife of 25 years with the spouse of a Hollywood mogul!”
A month after the publication of that alleged affair, Bezos accused the AMI of blackmail, saying it had threatened to publish his intimate photos unless he said publicly that the tabloid’s reporting was not politically motivated.
Bezos also stressed in a blog post that The Washington Post’s “unrelenting coverage” of the murder of Khashoggi was “undoubtedly unpopular in certain circles,” an apparent reference to the Saudi court and political groups within America allied to Riyadh.
Khashoggi — a late but vocal critic of Crown Prince Mohammed (MBS) — was killed and his body was dismembered by a Saudi hit squad after being lured into the kingdom’s consulate in Istanbul, Turkey, on October 2, 2018. His fate was unknown for several days, until Saudi Arabia confirmed under rising international pressure that he had been murdered at the consulate. Riyadh has not produced Khashoggi’s body to this day.
In his last years, Khashoggi lived in the US and wrote a column for The Washington Post.
The administration of US President Donald Trump has sided with Riyadh in the scandal, despite a conclusion by the CIA that Mohammed personally ordered the murder — a development first reported by the Post.
‘Mohammed considers Washington Post a major enemy’
In his Saturday article, de Becker said his investigation had “studied the well-documented and close relationship” between Mohammed —also known by his initials MBS — and AMI Chairman David Pecker.
“Some Americans will be surprised to learn that the Saudi government has been very intent on harming Jeff Bezos since last October, when the Post began its relentless coverage of Khashoggi’s murder,” he said. “It’s clear that MBS considers the Washington Post to be a major enemy.”
The security consultant said the AMI had previously demanded that he say his probe had concluded that the publisher had not relied upon “any form of electronic eavesdropping or hacking in their newsgathering process,” which he and Bezos refused to do.
De Becker also said he had turned over the findings of his inquiry to US federal officials.
Ever since Khashoggi disappeared at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, The Washington Post has been producing near-constant coverage on the case. That reportage has partially helped attract international attention to the scandal.
Bits and pieces of reporting by various international media have depicted a picture of Mohammed as a publicly innocuous but privately power-hungry figure who resorts to cunning and aggressive means to reach his goals.
Bezos also stressed in a blog post that The Washington Post’s “unrelenting coverage” of the murder of Khashoggi was “undoubtedly unpopular in certain circles,” an apparent reference to the Saudi court and political groups within America allied to Riyadh.
Khashoggi — a late but vocal critic of Crown Prince Mohammed (MBS) — was killed and his body was dismembered by a Saudi hit squad after being lured into the kingdom’s consulate in Istanbul, Turkey, on October 2, 2018. His fate was unknown for several days, until Saudi Arabia confirmed under rising international pressure that he had been murdered at the consulate. Riyadh has not produced Khashoggi’s body to this day.
In his last years, Khashoggi lived in the US and wrote a column for The Washington Post.
The administration of US President Donald Trump has sided with Riyadh in the scandal, despite a conclusion by the CIA that Mohammed personally ordered the murder — a development first reported by the Post.
‘Mohammed considers Washington Post a major enemy’
In his Saturday article, de Becker said his investigation had “studied the well-documented and close relationship” between Mohammed —also known by his initials MBS — and AMI Chairman David Pecker.
“Some Americans will be surprised to learn that the Saudi government has been very intent on harming Jeff Bezos since last October, when the Post began its relentless coverage of Khashoggi’s murder,” he said. “It’s clear that MBS considers the Washington Post to be a major enemy.”
The security consultant said the AMI had previously demanded that he say his probe had concluded that the publisher had not relied upon “any form of electronic eavesdropping or hacking in their newsgathering process,” which he and Bezos refused to do.
De Becker also said he had turned over the findings of his inquiry to US federal officials.
Ever since Khashoggi disappeared at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, The Washington Post has been producing near-constant coverage on the case. That reportage has partially helped attract international attention to the scandal.
Bits and pieces of reporting by various international media have depicted a picture of Mohammed as a publicly innocuous but privately power-hungry figure who resorts to cunning and aggressive means to reach his goals.
Source: Press TV
Your Comment