Tehran, YJC. Nuclear engineer says it pains the US to lose its last leverage against Iran.
In 1998, during the Clinton administration, the
United States Department of Defense vetoed a decision to send a group of
nuclear scientists to Iran to inspect the country’s nuclear program. Iranian-American
nuclear scientist Behrad Nakhai who was chosen to organize the visit says the
initiative had been Iran’s.
In interview with Mashreq, he said that although
the Pentagon could have placed some scientists of its own choice among the
visiting crew, it disagreed with the whole idea of such a visit. The following
is what Nakhai said in the interview:
When Iran’s nuclear program was growing, the
objective was to produce 20 thousand MW of the country’s electricity from the
nuclear energy. At that time our only revenue came from oil. So if oil was to
be used at home, the opportunity to make money from it and make investments
would have been wasted. For the fact that there were uranium mines in Iran, the
nuclear energy seemed a good choice where to make the country’s industrial
energy. Not only would Americans much encourage launching a nuclear program
in Iran, they would also support enriching uranium in Iran, so that they would
find customers for the uranium enriched in Iran and sell it to the world.
At that
time there were political issues for which the US could not enrich uranium
itself to sell it to other countries. That’s why it was looking forward to
doing the enrichment in Iran and selling it via Iran to other countries.
It is not right to say that Iran’s nuclear
program has been clandestine. If so, how come at the time of Reagan the US
pressurized the IAEA to stop cooperating with Iran on enrichment?
The Americans won’t be content if our nuclear
facilities are shut down or even destroyed. Their problem is that there are
people in Iran who have the nuclear knowhow and they might start Iran’s nuclear
program over.
Our
heavy water center is still in its preliminary stages and no nuclear substance
has been brought there, therefore it is not needed to be overseen by the IAEA. According
to the rules of the IAEA which we have signed and adhere to, we are bound to
report to the IAEA six months before we are ever going to take nuclear
substance into a building or facilities. Prior to that, we need not announce
it.
On the
other hand, France, who sees itself deprived of the Iranian market, has to
attract Arab countries in order to hold over their markets so that maybe it can
compensate. Strong opposition to Iran will turn not only the Zionist, but the Arab
countries toward France. French leaders’ statements do not come from reality
and are not honest; they rather come from their empty pockets. Now that they are
in harsh economic situations they follow the policy, so France should not be
counted at all here. The French Foreign Minister’s acts look rather like those
of a streetwalker.