Tehran, YJC. Activist believes that political freedom played a far smaller role in the recent Iranian presidential election than economic and foreign policy concerns.
![](https://cdn.yjc.ir/files/en/news/2013/6/26/5774_366.jpg)
Mashaallah Shamsolvaezin, a Reform activist and journalist, said "Of
10 I will give 6 points to economic demands. I will give 3 points to demands
for change in foreign policy, that is, the elimination of the sanctions and
driving Iran out of its current isolation. I will give 1 point to demands for ‘political
freedom.’”
He added "This election was unique in that most voters did not have
clear political demands from their winning candidate. That means that this year’s
election was not like those of 2009 or May 22, 1977. In this election few
people were concerned with political freedom.”
"We wanted a President who would solve economic problems, to the hell
with political freedom! Political freedom is usually demanded in societies
where you have acquired 5 out of ten of your life’s needs, that is, you should
have a healthy livelihood. The Prophet also said ‘One with no livelihood will
not have a resurrection either’,” Shamsolvaezin stated.
He asserted "When people’s money is depreciated to a third, political
freedom no doubt will not be their number one concern.”
With this in mind, Shamsolvaezin believed that Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei
would not have won the elections because people considered the Ahmadinejad administration
responsible for their livelihood difficulties.